The Differences Between the Application of the Think Pair Share (TPS) Cooperative Learning Model and the Conventional Model to Student Physics Learning Outcomes

  • La Ode Asmin Tadris Fisika, IAIN Kendari
  • Mujerimin Mujerimin Tadris Fisika, IAIN Kendari
  • La Isa Tadris Fisika, IAIN Kendari
  • Halmuniati Halmuniati Tadris Fisika, IAIN Kendari
  • Zainuddin Zainuddin Tadris Fisika, IAIN Kendari
Keywords: Learning models, Think pair share, cooperative learning, conventional methods, learning outcomes

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the application of the think pair share (TPS) learning method and conventional methods to student learning outcomes in physics learning. The type of research used is quasi-experimental (Quasy Experimental Design). The subjects in this study were two classes, namely 24 X MIPA 1 students as an experimental class using the Think Pair Share (TPS) learning method and 24 X MIPA 2 students as a control class using conventional methods. The sampling technique used purposive sampling. Data collection techniques using documentation, tests, and observations. The data analysis technique used in this study was the Independent Sample Test (t-test) with a significance level of 5%. Before the data were analyzed, a prerequisite test for normality analysis was carried out. The results showed that there were differences in the learning outcomes of students who were taught using the TPS method with conventional methods in physics subjects. Where the average post-test score for the experimental class was 72.45, higher than the control class, which was 51.54. These results indicate that student learning outcomes in the experimental class experienced a significant increase compared to the control class. The results of calculating the gain score for the experimental class obtained an average pre-test of 54.04 and a post-test of 72.45 so a Gain of 0.40 was obtained in the moderate category. Whereas in the control class, the average pre-test was 49.87 and the post-test was 51.54 so a gain of 0.03 was obtained in the low category. This shows that learning using the TPS method is better than using conventional methods.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

J. Indra Wandi, A. Ananda, and B. Nurdin, "The effect of think pair share method and students'creativity on students' learning outcome," no. 2015, pp. 918–926, 2018, doi: 10.29210/20181132.

T. Gok, "The Evaluation of Conceptual Learning and Epistemological Beliefs on Physics Learning by Think-Pair-Share," J. Educ. Sci. Environ. Heal., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 69–80, 2018, doi: 10.21891/jeseh.387489.

M. Balarabe, "Assessment Generated Constraints to Instruction and Learning in Nigeria Schools. System-Implications for lifelong learning and productivity," Sokoto Educ. Rev., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 39–49, 2006.

H. Qudsyi et al., “PENGARUH METODE PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF (COOPERATIVE LEARNING) DAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR SISWA SMA,” Proyeksi, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 34–49, 2006.

A. N. Quazi, "A Comparative Analysis of TPSCooperative Learning Model Over Conventional Teaching Method for Students' Achievement in Environmental Science: An Indian Case Study," Shanlax Int. J. Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 118–132, 2020, doi: 10.34293/education.v9i1.3460.

A. Ni’mah and P. Dwijananti, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) denganMetode Eksperimen untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Aktivitas Belajar Siswa Kelas VIII MTs. Nahdatul Muslimin Kudus,” Unnes Phys. Educ. J., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 18–25, 2014.

Wahyuni and R. Hasanah, “PENGARUH PENERAPAN METODE EKSPERIMEN DENGAN STRATEGI TPS (Think-Pair-Share) DALAM MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISKUSI TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATERI PERPINDAHAN PANAS DI KELAS VII SMP NEGERI 2 BUDURAN SIDOARJO,” Inov. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 89–94, 2013.

M. Muslimin, Nurlina, and D. H. Marisda, “Penerapan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Think Pair Share (Tps) Dengan Teknik Index Card Match Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika,” J. Ikat. Alumni Fis. Univ. Negeri Medan, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 59–66, 2020.

F. Gul and S. Shehzad, "Effects of Cooperative Learning on Students' Academic Achievement Effects of Cooperative Learning on Students' Academic Achievement," J. Educ. Learn., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 246–255, 2015, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v9i3.2071.

M. A. Asikainen and P. E. Hirvonen, "Finnish cooperating physics teachers' conceptions of physics teachers' teacher knowledge," J. Sci. Teacher Educ., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 431–450, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s10972-010-9187-y.

Z. Zainar, H. Fitria, and S. Eddy, "The relationship between learning strategies and learning interest against student learning outcomes at state elemetary," JPGI (Jurnal Penelit. Guru Indones., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 195, 2021, doi: 10.29210/021025jpgi0005.

Munawaroh, "The Influence of Teaching Methods and Learning Environment to the Student' s Learning Achievement of Craft and Entrepreneurship Subjects at Vocational High," vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 665–678, 2017.

Y. Sihombing, R. Simamora, and S. Dewi, "The Effect of Think Pair Share on Understanding Mathematical Concepts in Junior High School," pp. 77–86, 2021.

N. S. Dianti, Ni Putu Sri, Ketut Agustini, “Studi Komparatif Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Think Pair Share Dan Teams Games Tournament Terhadap Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar TIK Siswa Kelas VIII SMP N 1 Sawan Tahun Ajaran 2015/2016,” KARMAPATI (Kumpulan Artik. Mhs. Pendidik. Tek. Inform., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 178–189, 2016, doi: 10.23887/karmapati.v5i2.8214.

A. S. Adebayo and K. Judith, "Comparative Study of Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning Strategy and Traditional Instructional Method in the Physics Classroom: a Case of Chibote Girls Secondary School, Kitwe District, Zambia," Eur. J. Educ. Sci., vol. 01, no. 01, pp. 30–41, 2014, doi: 10.19044/ejes.v1no1a4.

E. Appiah-Twumasi, V. Antwi, I. Kwesi Anderson, and N. Sakyi-Hagan, "Comparative Effect of Cooperative Learning on Students' Performance in Mechanics Concepts: A Case of Two Secondary Schools in Berekum Municipality, Ghana," East African J. Educ. Soc. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 139–151, 2020, doi: 10.46606/eajess2020v01i01.0015.

J. A. Pratiningsih, H. Sahidu, and K. Kosim, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think-Pair-Share Dengan Metode Eksperimen Terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Man Lombok Barat Tahun Pelajaran 2017/2018,” J. Pendidik. Fis. dan Teknol., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 90–97, 2018, doi: 10.29303/jpft.v4i1.474.

M. H. Lin, H. C. Chen, and K. S. Liu, "A study of the effects of digital learning on learning motivation and learning outcome," Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 3553–3564, 2017, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00744a.

S. Mendo-lázaro, B. León-del-barco, M.-I. Polo-del-Río, and V. M. López-Ramos, "The Impact of Cooperative Learning on University Students' Academic Goals," vol. 12, no. January, pp. 1–7, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.787210.

I. G. A. Sadiawan, I. M. C. Wibawa, and P. A. Antara, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Think Pair Share Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam,” J. Pedagog. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 27, 2019, doi: 10.23887/jp2.v1i1.19328.

Y. A. Sembiring and D. Zagoto, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) dengan Bantuan Praktikum Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika,” EduMatSains J. Pendidikan, Mat. Dan Sains, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 177–190, 2017, doi: 10.33541/edumatsains.v1i2.242.

T. M. Hidayat and A. Muhson, "The Impact of Think Pair Share and Two Stay Two Stray Learning Model Towards Learning Outcomes and Cooperation Ability," Din. Pendidik., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 119–129, 2018, doi: 10.15294/dp.v13i1.15045.

A. U. Rehman, H. A. Nadeem, and M. Rafiq, "Effect of Think-Pair-Share Teaching Strategy on Understanding the Concept of Science in Students at Elementary Level," Harf-o-Sukhan, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 333–345, 2021.

N. Novita and R. H. Sakdiah, Halimatus, Junaida, “PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK PAIR SHARE TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA SMAN 1 PANTE CEUREUMEN,” Relativ. J. Ris. Inov. Pembelajaran Fis., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 81–89, 2021, doi: 10.29103/relativitas.v4i2.3776.
M. Kaddoura, "Think Pair Share: A teaching Learning Strategy to Enhance Students' Critical Thinking," Educ. Res. Q., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 3–24, 2007.

Kasimuddin, “Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Fisika Peserta Didik Kelas XI IPA 2 SMA Negeri 9 Makassar,” J. Pendidik. Fis. Univ. Muhammadiyah Makassar, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 54–72, 2016.

L. C. McDermott, "Oersted Medal Lecture 2001: 'Physics Education Research—The Key to Student Learning,'" Am. J. Phys., vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 1127–1137, 2001, doi: 10.1119/1.1389280.

O. P. Ajaja, "Effects of Cooperative Learning Strategy on Junior Secondary School Students Achievement in Integrated Science," vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2010.

U. F. Peter, P. Okoli, and J. Nwanneka, "Effect of Think-Pair-Share Teaching Strategy on Secondary School Students' Achievement in Chemistry in Cross River State," vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 42–48, 2021, doi: 10.9790/7388-1102044248.

R. K. A. Hamdan, "The Effect of (Think – Pair – Share ) Strategy on the Achievement of Third Grade Student in Sciences in the Educational District of Irbid," vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 88–95, 2017.
Published
2023-06-30
How to Cite
Asmin, L. O., Mujerimin, M., Isa, L., Halmuniati, H., & Zainuddin, Z. (2023). The Differences Between the Application of the Think Pair Share (TPS) Cooperative Learning Model and the Conventional Model to Student Physics Learning Outcomes. KONSTAN - JURNAL FISIKA DAN PENDIDIKAN FISIKA, 8(01), 1-10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20414/konstan.v8i01.281